Public Policy Blog

Updates on technology policy issues

More Choice for Users: Unlisted Videos

Thursday, May 13, 2010
Share on Google+ Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
Google
Labels: Public Policy Blog

3 comments :

  1. UnknownMay 13, 2010 at 6:27 PM

    As useful as this will be for Melinda and others like her I foresee a wave of amateur porn and sex video leaks all with "secret" unlisted YouTube links.

    Not that this will bother me as I won't be hosting all those files, and I won't have to see anything I don't want to see.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. AnnaMay 20, 2010 at 11:51 PM

    @Ian_M., is that really an issue? There's already plenty of porn, spam and other material that makes it onto YouTube every hour as it stands. The flagging system allows users to bring the stuff to YouTube attention for removal, and a high percentage of it does get removed, I suspect.

    I suspect the cost of extra bandwidth and storage is far less than the cost of a more effective approach to attempted prevention?

    If people combine porn uploads with spamming Unlisted video links, I'd expect a similar end result... at least some of those getting the spam are likely to flag these videos as well. Time will tell, though.

    I've been hoping for some usable semi-private feature like this for a long time. I don't want to be harsh, but the existing privacy options have been largely useless, at least to me, since most of my RL friends and relatives are unlikely to create a YouTube channel, just to watch my private videos.

    Also, my understanding from other users is that any account without a perfect record is currently unable to use this feature, so those that try to spam using this, are likely to find that they'll lose the feature for any channels where they try it.

    Your point does actually suggest to me one credible reason why that that move may have been made... it's something more than a few users are not too happy about, now that the feature exists, especially if they don't have access to it due to some long-ago single strike against their account.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. UnknownMay 22, 2010 at 3:26 PM

    @Aza, your probably right that it won't make that much difference to the spam situation.

    Needing a perfect record will prevent casual spammers and people who have made a mistake, but have a real investment in their current channel from posting Unlisted Videos.

    However, many spammers will just make a new account if there current account gets banned. So I have doubts that even a one strike policy will really cut back on spam links.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

The comments on this blog belong only to the person who posted them. We do, however, reserve the right to remove off-topic or inappropriate comments.

  

Labels


  • Accessibility 5
  • Ad 2
  • Advertising 11
  • AdWords 2
  • Anti-defamation league 1
  • Book Search 16
  • Broadband 11
  • Business Issues 26
  • Buzz 1
  • buzzemail 1
  • Canada 1
  • Child Safety 18
  • Chrome 1
  • Cloud Computing 2
  • Competition 19
  • Congress 10
  • Constitute 1
  • copyright 7
  • Cuba 1
  • Cybersecurity 9
  • D.C. Talks 16
  • Digital Due Process 1
  • Digital Playbook 1
  • Economic Impact 5
  • Economy 13
  • ECPA 4
  • Elections 24
  • email 1
  • Energy Efficiency 29
  • Europe 2
  • FCC 7
  • fellowship 2
  • Fighting Human Trafficking 1
  • Free Expression 54
  • Geo 1
  • Gmail 1
  • GNI 2
  • Good to Know 5
  • Google Fellow 2
  • Google for Entrepreneurs 1
  • Google Ideas 2
  • Google Maps 1
  • Google Policy Fellowship 1
  • Google Tools 78
  • Government Transparency 33
  • Hate Speech 1
  • Health 5
  • How Google Fights Piracy 1
  • Human trafficking 1
  • Identity theft 1
  • Immigration 1
  • Intellectual Property 19
  • International 46
  • Journalists 1
  • Malware 1
  • Maps 1
  • National Consumer Protection Week 1
  • Net Neutrality 24
  • Patents 5
  • piracy. ad networks 2
  • Politicians at Google 11
  • Politics 23
  • Privacy 93
  • Public Policy 1
  • Public Policy Blog 806
  • Safe Browsing 3
  • scams 1
  • search 3
  • Security 17
  • Small Businesses 3
  • spectrum 4
  • State Issues 5
  • Surveillance 6
  • Technology for Good 1
  • Telecom 71
  • Trade 3
  • Transparency Report 4
  • White Spaces 23
  • WiFi Network 1
  • Workforce 5
  • Yahoo-Google Deal 5
  • YouTube 4
  • YouTube for Government 1


Archive


  •     2016
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
  •     2015
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2014
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2013
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2012
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2011
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2010
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2009
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2008
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2007
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr

Feed

Give us feedback in our Product Forums.

Company-wide

  • Official Google Blog
  • Europe Blog
  • Student Blog

Products

  • Android Blog
  • Chrome Blog
  • Lat Long Blog

Developers

  • Developers Blog
  • Ads Developer Blog
  • Android Developers Blog
  • Google
  • Privacy
  • Terms