Public Policy Blog

Updates on technology policy issues

WiFi data collection: an update

Friday, May 14, 2010
Share on Google+ Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
Google
Labels: Privacy , Public Policy Blog

6 comments :

  1. UnknownMay 15, 2010 at 4:06 PM

    Google does no evil.
    When it does, it apologizes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. JMSMay 16, 2010 at 12:28 PM

    Once again Google has demonstrated a lack of concern for privacy. Its computer engineers run amok, push the envelope and gather whatever data they can until their fingers are caught in the cookie jar. Then a Google executive apologizes, mouthing bafflegab about how privacy matters to the company.

    The takeaway from this incident is the clear need for government oversight and regulation of the data all online companies gather and store. The Justice Department or the Federal Communications Commission should examine the Google case in the United States.

    Google’s announced plan to have an unnamed third party study what went wrong and to check that the improperly gathered private data has been eliminated is inadequate.

    That’s like getting to pick the referees in a championship football game.

    Consumer Watchdog is pleased Google has announced it will now offer SSL encryption on its search engine. This is a substantial protection for consumers. Google deserves praise for this important step and other companies should follow Google's lead.

    Now, Google needs to factor privacy in from the beginning of all projects, rather than simply gathering as much data as it can, simply because it can. I hope they will learn a valuable lesson from this debacle.

    --John M. Simpson
    Consumer advocate
    Consumer Watchdog

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. chambersMay 20, 2010 at 5:26 PM

    I agree that with such power as what Google wields, a separate Caution Department needs to be in place with round-the-clock operation; checking, balancing, brainstorming and simulating all the worst case scenarios before releases.

    But I give them credit for their openness about the matter. Of all the company press releases I've read, Google's was the most candid, honest and personable – what one would expect from a good company that made an honest mistake and has nothing to hide.

    So I don't agree with the lawsuits.

    I wish I could give you angry people what you want. If only I had a magic wand with which to grant it, namely, banishing you to the Hidden Realm of Privacy along with all the lawyers and class action plaintiffs who are seeking to capitalize from this. Ah, and that is all you really want, isn't it? To stick your greedy hands into Google's deep pockets.

    Nothing happened. No harm was done. Unless I am mistaken, no ones privacy was compromised that resulted in damages.

    If only I could make those lawyers go *poof*!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. Larry MedinaMay 21, 2010 at 10:46 AM

    "Google does no evil. When it does it apologizes"

    EXCUSE ME?!?!?!

    The fact that they set the systems up to capture ANYTHING aside from images at a Street View in the first place was EVIL... this was far outside the stated parameters of the project, which was already drawing complaints from many.

    Gathering information about networks, whether it was "just snippets" or otherwise was nothing but invasion and techno snooping... what would have happened if someone from a Foreign Government had been caught doing this??

    No evil? Think again... and as far as apologizing, well so did some of the Catholic priests that abused children, but I doubt they'll be forgiven either.

    I hope the EFF helps the Senate build a case and they rip Google a new one over this

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. FefeJune 9, 2010 at 6:23 AM

    irony

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  6. AnonymousFebruary 27, 2011 at 11:46 PM

    Why on earth were you collecting ssid and mac address info in the first place? This is supposed to be o.k. as long as you're not collecting payload data? How so? Please, I can find no post anywhere where Google justifies this flagrant abuse of customer and citizen trust. After something like this, why should anyone trust any of your services?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

The comments on this blog belong only to the person who posted them. We do, however, reserve the right to remove off-topic or inappropriate comments.

  

Labels


  • Accessibility 5
  • Ad 2
  • Advertising 11
  • AdWords 2
  • Anti-defamation league 1
  • Book Search 16
  • Broadband 11
  • Business Issues 26
  • Buzz 1
  • buzzemail 1
  • Canada 1
  • Child Safety 18
  • Chrome 1
  • Cloud Computing 2
  • Competition 19
  • Congress 10
  • Constitute 1
  • copyright 7
  • Cuba 1
  • Cybersecurity 9
  • D.C. Talks 16
  • Digital Due Process 1
  • Digital Playbook 1
  • Economic Impact 5
  • Economy 13
  • ECPA 4
  • Elections 24
  • email 1
  • Energy Efficiency 29
  • Europe 2
  • FCC 7
  • fellowship 2
  • Fighting Human Trafficking 1
  • Free Expression 54
  • Geo 1
  • Gmail 1
  • GNI 2
  • Good to Know 5
  • Google Fellow 2
  • Google for Entrepreneurs 1
  • Google Ideas 2
  • Google Maps 1
  • Google Policy Fellowship 1
  • Google Tools 78
  • Government Transparency 33
  • Hate Speech 1
  • Health 5
  • How Google Fights Piracy 1
  • Human trafficking 1
  • Identity theft 1
  • Immigration 1
  • Intellectual Property 19
  • International 46
  • Journalists 1
  • Malware 1
  • Maps 1
  • National Consumer Protection Week 1
  • Net Neutrality 24
  • Patents 5
  • piracy. ad networks 2
  • Politicians at Google 11
  • Politics 23
  • Privacy 93
  • Public Policy 1
  • Public Policy Blog 806
  • Safe Browsing 3
  • scams 1
  • search 3
  • Security 17
  • Small Businesses 3
  • spectrum 4
  • State Issues 5
  • Surveillance 6
  • Technology for Good 1
  • Telecom 71
  • Trade 3
  • Transparency Report 4
  • White Spaces 23
  • WiFi Network 1
  • Workforce 5
  • Yahoo-Google Deal 5
  • YouTube 4
  • YouTube for Government 1


Archive


  •     2016
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
  •     2015
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2014
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2013
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2012
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2011
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2010
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2009
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2008
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2007
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr

Feed

Give us feedback in our Product Forums.

Company-wide

  • Official Google Blog
  • Europe Blog
  • Student Blog

Products

  • Android Blog
  • Chrome Blog
  • Lat Long Blog

Developers

  • Developers Blog
  • Ads Developer Blog
  • Android Developers Blog
  • Google
  • Privacy
  • Terms