Public Policy Blog

Updates on technology policy issues

A common sense approach to Internet safety

Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Share on Google+ Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
Google
Labels: Child Safety , Privacy , Public Policy Blog

2 comments :

  1. Dominic JonesMarch 26, 2008 at 3:35 PM

    With the Internet so central to our children's lives, it is vital that companies like Google do everything possible to support online safety.

    However, Google has more work to do.

    Through its anonymous Gmail service, Google is making it easier for bad people to abuse and attack children, and it is making it harder for families to protect their kids and investigate possible safety breaches.

    Unlike other free email providers -- such as Microsoft and Yahoo! -- Google's Gmail does not include the originating IP address of the sender in the email code. This flaw effectively makes Gmail an anonymous email system that can easily be used for evil purposes.

    Anyone can use Gmail to target a child and there is no way for a parent, a school or a law enforcement officer to find out who the sender might be without the laborious process of getting a court order to compel Google to hand over the information. The extra time required to find out the originating IP address of a sender prolongs the agony of victims and increases the stress on traumatized families.

    With Yahoo or Microsoft's products, finding out the IP address of the person who sent an email takes less than a minute, and an IP whois trace can be done in a few seconds. Often, this information will do nothing more than put a victimized family's minds at ease. For example, knowing that a perpetrator is located in another city or country can make a world of difference to a victim who does not know who is targeting them.

    Admittedly, originating IP addresses don't always identify senders and there are ways to spoof them. But having access to the originating IP address is one important tool parents and schools increasingly need to investigate cyberbullying and other online assaults on children.

    I only know about this issue because of having recently investigated a case of a young girl (my daughter) being bullied online by another child who just happened to use Gmail (along with several other email services.) In investigating the case, I discovered that Gmail is entirely anonymous. This made it harder to track down the instigator and prolonged the victim's agony of not knowing who was targeting her.

    Without any help from Google, I was eventually able to capture the instigator's IP address and identify the perpetrator. But I realized that someone who is less tech savvy than me would still be trying to get a court order to make Google hand over information that is not privileged in the first case.

    I'm not saying Google has deliberately created this situation, but the lack of response I've received from the company to this issue certainly raises serious questions about its willingness to do the right thing.

    Please, please, please fix this before more kids get hurt.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. April McGowanApril 1, 2008 at 7:06 PM

    I too, would like a safe email address for my kids. My daughter is JUST starting to email her friends (she's ten) and my son gets email from Grandma. My son (age 5) had 600 spams, mostly about sex, in his spam box. As he doesn't use his email with anyone publicly (except Grandma, and we're pretty sure Grandma didn't sell him out), then how they got it is shocking. Even more so, what they are sending. I don't want him or my daughter to see any lines about what they are selling, and WHY.
    I wish there was a safe way for them to ONLY receive mail from their contact list, and everything else go to trash, before it even made it to their page.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

The comments on this blog belong only to the person who posted them. We do, however, reserve the right to remove off-topic or inappropriate comments.

  

Labels


  • Accessibility 5
  • Ad 2
  • Advertising 11
  • AdWords 2
  • Anti-defamation league 1
  • Book Search 16
  • Broadband 11
  • Business Issues 26
  • Buzz 1
  • buzzemail 1
  • Canada 1
  • Child Safety 18
  • Chrome 1
  • Cloud Computing 2
  • Competition 19
  • Congress 10
  • Constitute 1
  • copyright 7
  • Cuba 1
  • Cybersecurity 9
  • D.C. Talks 16
  • Digital Due Process 1
  • Digital Playbook 1
  • Economic Impact 5
  • Economy 13
  • ECPA 4
  • Elections 24
  • email 1
  • Energy Efficiency 29
  • Europe 2
  • FCC 7
  • fellowship 2
  • Fighting Human Trafficking 1
  • Free Expression 54
  • Geo 1
  • Gmail 1
  • GNI 2
  • Good to Know 5
  • Google Fellow 2
  • Google for Entrepreneurs 1
  • Google Ideas 2
  • Google Maps 1
  • Google Policy Fellowship 1
  • Google Tools 78
  • Government Transparency 33
  • Hate Speech 1
  • Health 5
  • How Google Fights Piracy 1
  • Human trafficking 1
  • Identity theft 1
  • Immigration 1
  • Intellectual Property 19
  • International 46
  • Journalists 1
  • Malware 1
  • Maps 1
  • National Consumer Protection Week 1
  • Net Neutrality 24
  • Patents 5
  • piracy. ad networks 2
  • Politicians at Google 11
  • Politics 23
  • Privacy 93
  • Public Policy 1
  • Public Policy Blog 806
  • Safe Browsing 3
  • scams 1
  • search 3
  • Security 17
  • Small Businesses 3
  • spectrum 4
  • State Issues 5
  • Surveillance 6
  • Technology for Good 1
  • Telecom 71
  • Trade 3
  • Transparency Report 4
  • White Spaces 23
  • WiFi Network 1
  • Workforce 5
  • Yahoo-Google Deal 5
  • YouTube 4
  • YouTube for Government 1


Archive


  •     2016
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
  •     2015
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2014
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2013
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2012
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2011
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2010
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2009
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2008
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2007
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr

Feed

Give us feedback in our Product Forums.

Company-wide

  • Official Google Blog
  • Europe Blog
  • Student Blog

Products

  • Android Blog
  • Chrome Blog
  • Lat Long Blog

Developers

  • Developers Blog
  • Ads Developer Blog
  • Android Developers Blog
  • Google
  • Privacy
  • Terms