Public Policy Blog

Updates on technology policy issues

Don’t censor the web

Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Share on Google+ Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
Google
Labels: copyright , Public Policy Blog

6 comments :

  1. John ConleyJanuary 18, 2012 at 8:15 AM

    Yay spam posts. anyways, i didn't see anything from twitter, and i thought they said they were not participating? and tumblr isn't doing anything either.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Jon GarfunkelJanuary 18, 2012 at 8:39 AM

    Ironic that you have 7 spam comments from overnight on this blog post...

    As a Google shareholder and user, I've been looking for your position on this:
    When Google users search for, say, *glee stream*, what links should come up? Should they be what Amazon, Hulu, and the content providers want? Or what the "Internet" wants -- sites providing links to unlicensed versions?

    https://plus.google.com/u/0/111589338887233889734/posts/d6FUDCW9mM5

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. ojwolanykJanuary 18, 2012 at 11:19 AM

    I am in agreement that government has to not interfere with our freedom to communicate. However, given Google's actions in supporting the suppression of free speech in Communist China over the internet it seems that Google itself is in a poor position to be a credible voice for freedom of expression.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. AnonymousJanuary 18, 2012 at 3:30 PM

    If the bill passes does it mean people can post copyrighted material and/or links to copyrighted material on government websites and politicians websites and get them shut down? I reckon small companies could moniter their users post better than bigger companies with millions of users.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. sushilkinJanuary 19, 2012 at 4:32 AM

    Both SOPA and PIPA should be stopped.
    I signed the petition and you can also found it here.

    http://www.squidoo.com/sopa-pipa
    https://www.facebook.com/NoSOPA.NoPIPA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  6. Mark SJanuary 19, 2012 at 9:23 AM

    Yeah spam posts. anyways, i didn't see anything from twitter, and i thought they said they were not participating? and tumblr isn't doing anything either.

    Social Networks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

The comments on this blog belong only to the person who posted them. We do, however, reserve the right to remove off-topic or inappropriate comments.

  

Labels


  • Accessibility 5
  • Ad 2
  • Advertising 11
  • AdWords 2
  • Anti-defamation league 1
  • Book Search 16
  • Broadband 11
  • Business Issues 26
  • Buzz 1
  • buzzemail 1
  • Canada 1
  • Child Safety 18
  • Chrome 1
  • Cloud Computing 2
  • Competition 19
  • Congress 10
  • Constitute 1
  • copyright 7
  • Cuba 1
  • Cybersecurity 9
  • D.C. Talks 16
  • Digital Due Process 1
  • Digital Playbook 1
  • Economic Impact 5
  • Economy 13
  • ECPA 4
  • Elections 24
  • email 1
  • Energy Efficiency 29
  • Europe 2
  • FCC 7
  • fellowship 2
  • Fighting Human Trafficking 1
  • Free Expression 54
  • Geo 1
  • Gmail 1
  • GNI 2
  • Good to Know 5
  • Google Fellow 2
  • Google for Entrepreneurs 1
  • Google Ideas 2
  • Google Maps 1
  • Google Policy Fellowship 1
  • Google Tools 78
  • Government Transparency 33
  • Hate Speech 1
  • Health 5
  • How Google Fights Piracy 1
  • Human trafficking 1
  • Identity theft 1
  • Immigration 1
  • Intellectual Property 19
  • International 46
  • Journalists 1
  • Malware 1
  • Maps 1
  • National Consumer Protection Week 1
  • Net Neutrality 24
  • Patents 5
  • piracy. ad networks 2
  • Politicians at Google 11
  • Politics 23
  • Privacy 93
  • Public Policy 1
  • Public Policy Blog 806
  • Safe Browsing 3
  • scams 1
  • search 3
  • Security 17
  • Small Businesses 3
  • spectrum 4
  • State Issues 5
  • Surveillance 6
  • Technology for Good 1
  • Telecom 71
  • Trade 3
  • Transparency Report 4
  • White Spaces 23
  • WiFi Network 1
  • Workforce 5
  • Yahoo-Google Deal 5
  • YouTube 4
  • YouTube for Government 1


Archive


  •     2016
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
  •     2015
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2014
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2013
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2012
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2011
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2010
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2009
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2008
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2007
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr

Feed

Give us feedback in our Product Forums.

Company-wide

  • Official Google Blog
  • Europe Blog
  • Student Blog

Products

  • Android Blog
  • Chrome Blog
  • Lat Long Blog

Developers

  • Developers Blog
  • Ads Developer Blog
  • Android Developers Blog
  • Google
  • Privacy
  • Terms