Public Policy Blog

Updates on technology policy issues

Notification of security breaches in the EU

Thursday, October 25, 2007
Share on Google+ Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
Google
Labels: International , Privacy , Public Policy Blog

5 comments :

  1. Scott YatesOctober 26, 2007 at 12:24 AM

    While there are 39 states that have some law, nearly all the states are tinkering with security breach legislation every year.

    Like so much that goes through the state houses, this is constantly a moving target.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. UnknownNovember 3, 2007 at 1:40 PM

    Peter, many EU states have either codified criminal code or common law to deal with such infractions. As you'll possibly be aware (or not) criminal law is not govered in the main be the central EU institutions, period. So perhaps you could go off and study the EU 27 member state and tell us which don't have security breach legislation? I think you'll find that most of them do.

    As a side note, most member states additionally have 'shields' from interference in criminal matters in relation to EU institutions, unless they fall into pillar 1. Even still certain countries are opting out.

    Ronan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Martin FNovember 12, 2007 at 6:19 AM

    Peter, thanks for an interesting piece. FYI an influential UK legislative body has called for security breach legislation in the UK as a priority. An UK minister also admitted that this is "enticing" conceptually. However the complexities of establishing the correct notification triggers and appropriately balanced notification regime are likely to delay this for a while. As for linkage with EU harmonisation, the report calls for UK not to wait for an EU-led intiative.

    See chapter 5
    http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldselect/ldsctech/165/165i.pdf

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. AnonymousJuly 31, 2008 at 12:12 AM

    好想你枣
    北京好想你枣
    轴承
    进口轴承
    FAG轴承
    NTN轴承
    NSK轴承
    SKF轴承
    网站建设
    网站推广
    googel左侧优化
    googel左侧推广
    搜索引擎优化

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. AnonymousAugust 22, 2008 at 12:10 AM

    铜米机

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

The comments on this blog belong only to the person who posted them. We do, however, reserve the right to remove off-topic or inappropriate comments.

  

Labels


  • Accessibility 5
  • Ad 2
  • Advertising 11
  • AdWords 2
  • Anti-defamation league 1
  • Book Search 16
  • Broadband 11
  • Business Issues 26
  • Buzz 1
  • buzzemail 1
  • Canada 1
  • Child Safety 18
  • Chrome 1
  • Cloud Computing 2
  • Competition 19
  • Congress 10
  • Constitute 1
  • copyright 7
  • Cuba 1
  • Cybersecurity 9
  • D.C. Talks 16
  • Digital Due Process 1
  • Digital Playbook 1
  • Economic Impact 5
  • Economy 13
  • ECPA 4
  • Elections 24
  • email 1
  • Energy Efficiency 29
  • Europe 2
  • FCC 7
  • fellowship 2
  • Fighting Human Trafficking 1
  • Free Expression 54
  • Geo 1
  • Gmail 1
  • GNI 2
  • Good to Know 5
  • Google Fellow 2
  • Google for Entrepreneurs 1
  • Google Ideas 2
  • Google Maps 1
  • Google Policy Fellowship 1
  • Google Tools 78
  • Government Transparency 33
  • Hate Speech 1
  • Health 5
  • How Google Fights Piracy 1
  • Human trafficking 1
  • Identity theft 1
  • Immigration 1
  • Intellectual Property 19
  • International 46
  • Journalists 1
  • Malware 1
  • Maps 1
  • National Consumer Protection Week 1
  • Net Neutrality 24
  • Patents 5
  • piracy. ad networks 2
  • Politicians at Google 11
  • Politics 23
  • Privacy 93
  • Public Policy 1
  • Public Policy Blog 806
  • Safe Browsing 3
  • scams 1
  • search 3
  • Security 17
  • Small Businesses 3
  • spectrum 4
  • State Issues 5
  • Surveillance 6
  • Technology for Good 1
  • Telecom 71
  • Trade 3
  • Transparency Report 4
  • White Spaces 23
  • WiFi Network 1
  • Workforce 5
  • Yahoo-Google Deal 5
  • YouTube 4
  • YouTube for Government 1


Archive


  •     2016
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
  •     2015
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2014
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2013
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2012
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2011
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2010
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2009
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2008
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr
    • Mar
    • Feb
    • Jan
  •     2007
    • Dec
    • Nov
    • Oct
    • Sep
    • Aug
    • Jul
    • Jun
    • May
    • Apr

Feed

Give us feedback in our Product Forums.

Company-wide

  • Official Google Blog
  • Europe Blog
  • Student Blog

Products

  • Android Blog
  • Chrome Blog
  • Lat Long Blog

Developers

  • Developers Blog
  • Ads Developer Blog
  • Android Developers Blog
  • Google
  • Privacy
  • Terms